[Nanog-futures] blacklists getting out of hand?
Lynda
shrdlu at deaddrop.org
Wed Nov 28 22:00:34 UTC 2007
Christopher Morrow wrote:
>On Nov 28, 2007 12:30 PM, Lynda <shrdlu at deaddrop.org> wrote:
>
>
>>Could I just send the email from a local server? Sure, but the ability
>>to filter spam for this particular domain is high on my list, and I use
>>pair's servers to do so, before I ever see anything. It isn't an easy
>>question, and I know it isn't. I was prompted to note this only because
>>I see that the escalation vis-a-vis current AUP enforcements is only
>>going to be aggravated by the fact that Martin is using a gmail address
>>(which means a whole lot of bounces, unfortunately).
>>
>>
>
>So, if you let someone else manage your 'spam problem' (which is what
>using RBL's is doing) there's a chance that their set of 'policies'
>will intersect in a bad way with your business needs.
>
>
Well, they're not really business needs. I also suspect that I didn't
make my point clearly. I was speaking of the fact that some people are
using gmail, and others are bouncing it, and using myself as an example.
It isn't really causing me, personally, a problem. I just use a local
machine, not on anyone's blacklist, for those rare occurrences where it
matters to me. Mostly, it doesn't.
>That said, shouldn't pair's server setup allow you to whitelist?
>
>
That would be on the receiving end, which is the opposite end of which I
speak. I was talking specifically about my using a relay at pair to send
email out from whichever_account at deaddrop.org, and having one or two
bounce because pair's smtp server that is used as a relay made it into
a blacklist.
>>No easy answers, are there?
>>
>>
>
>no.... but that's why you get paid the big bucks? :)
>
>
Oh, not any more, I don't. I am *retired* (Woot!).
--
...Deep Hack Mode -- that mysterious and frightening state of
consciousness where Mortal Users fear to tread.
Matt Welsh
(also see: http://catb.org/jargon/html/H/hack-mode.html)
More information about the Nanog-futures
mailing list