[Nanog-futures] Cisco outage

[J Bacher]

Todd Underwood wrote:

> does anyone else (aside from marty) actually think that AUP applies to
> mail between list members?  this just seems silly.  the poster may
> violate the AUP for some other reason, but having an account that
> bounces email from marty's choice of smtp provider certainly doesn't
> qualify.

Absent an inability to have a private conversation as an admin, what do you 
(all) suggest?  An admin email to the list directed to that individual?  Do 
nothing, apply the three strikes you're out when applicable without any 
notification?

I don't agree that we should have to accept mail from anywhere we choose not to 
particularly when the various blacklists are useful to reduce spam.

The AUP does not apply in this case.  However, it does seem that Marty (and 
whomever) are between a rock and a hard place with the options left if private 
mail is not deliverable.

Do the various committee members not have a personal email account from 
nanog.org|merit.edu that can be used?  If not, why not?