[Nanog-futures] Cisco outage

Lucy Lynch llynch at civil-tongue.net
Wed Nov 28 18:42:48 UTC 2007


On Wed, 28 Nov 2007, Martin Hannigan wrote:

> On Nov 28, 2007 1:18 PM, Gregory Hicks <ghicks at cadence.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 10:11:14 -0800
>>> From: Randy Bush <randy at psg.com>
>>> To: Martin Hannigan <hannigan at gmail.com>
>>> Cc: nanog-futures at nanog.org
>>> Subject: Re: [Nanog-futures] Cisco outage
>>>
>>>> Should we remove this person or not?
>>>
>>> why?  just because he calls you on your bs?  pfui!  pick on someone your
>>> own size.
>>
>> It seems to be a cut and dried case of "mail bouncing".  If mail
>> bounces, the address is "not good" and should be removed.
>>
>> I would NOT remove him for the content of the messages though but for
>> mail connectivity.  (White listing could have solved the connectivity
>> issue.)
>>
>
>
> Not for the content. Randy is a little excitable since he and the SC
> have been marginalized for the most part. AUP Item #8 seems to apply.
> I'm asking if it's what people really want.

no, that's not what I want.

- Lucy

>
>
> -M<
>
> _______________________________________________
> Nanog-futures mailing list
> Nanog-futures at nanog.org
> http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-futures
>



More information about the Nanog-futures mailing list