[Nanog-futures] nanog AUP wrt subject evolution (was: Creating a crystal clear and pure Internet)

[Alfred Farrington II]

I agree with staying  on topic as well. No, Jim I'm not a purist :)

On Nov 27, 2007 5:10 PM, Jim Popovitch <yahoo at jimpop.com> wrote:

> On Tue, 2007-11-27 at 15:16 -0500, Jared Mauch wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 03:11:33PM -0500, Alfred Farrington II wrote:
> > >  keep politics/culture/society out of it. Maintain as *internet
> > > operations* list. There's enough of this in the world already.
> >
> >       I suspect that's a bit too purist.  there are other things
> > that have implications to operations, eg: Calea politics and reality
> > may make operations folks do things differently.  I'm not suggesting
> > that nanog be a forum for lobbying the various governments in the
> region,
> > but we don't operate in a vacuum either.
>
> IMHO, the prudent AUP approach should be focused on maintaining the
> Subject line with the Body.  Clearly everybody has something to add to
> anything posted.  The big problem is wanting to listen/learn about
> something on IPv6, only to discover that %50 of the posts aren't aligned
> with the Subject.  Each receiver can then kill-thread as they see
> appropriate, and everybody will be happy.
>
> -Jim P.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Nanog-futures mailing list
> Nanog-futures at nanog.org
> http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-futures
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog-futures/attachments/20071127/7ce3e058/attachment.htm